Amphenol ICC (FCI) Dubox receptacle, order code 87606-413, 26 positions, dual row, 0.100" (2.54mm) pitch, female socket, tin-lead mating and post plating, through-hole solder termination, tube packaging.
87606-413
87606-413 Amphenol ICC Dubox Receptacle, 26-Pos, 2.54mm
MPN87606-413
Obsolete
Amphenol ICC (FCI) Dubox receptacle, order code 87606-413, 26 positions, dual row, 0.100" (2.54mm) pitch, female socket, tin-lead mating and post plating, through-hole solder termination, tube packaging.
$1.4511Ref. price · indicative, final on quote
Source DocumentedChannel stated on listing & quote
Condition PhotosReal unit photos / video on request
WhatsApp AnswersFast human replies for stock & sourcing questions
Worldwide DispatchDHL/FedEx — transit quoted per order
Independent supplier — new & surplus connector stock· Listing updated Jul 2026
Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Series | Dubox™ |
| Type | Female Socket |
| Mounting | Through Hole |
| Connector type | Receptacle |
| Fastening type | Push-Pull |
| Contact material | Phosphor Bronze |
| Insulation color | Blue |
| Insulation height | 0.335\" (8.51mm) |
| Insulation material | Thermoplastic, Glass Filled |
| Material flammability rating | UL94 V-0 |
| Style | Board to Board |
| Package | Tube |
All specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Termination | Solder |
| Applications | Automotive, General Purpose, Industrial, Telecommunications |
| Contact shape | Square |
| Rows | 2 |
| Pitch | 0.100\" (2.54mm) |
| Positions | 26 |
| Row spacing - mating | 0.100\" (2.54mm) |
| Contact finish - post | Tin-Lead |
| Contact length - post | 0.114\" (2.90mm) |
| Contact finish - mating | Tin-Lead |
| Contact finish thickness - post | 78.7µin (2.00µm) |
| Contact finish thickness - mating | 78.7µin (2.00µm) |
Product details
Frequently asked questions
Where can I buy the 87606-413 and how do I get a price?
The 87606-413 is available through independent surplus channels.
What is the closest pin-compatible alternative to the 87606-413?
The functional replacement would be a different part number and likely a different footprint — a board spin is required.